What really happens with thousands of patients, not what we think happens
More than 20,374 real treatments analyzed in routine clinical practice. Discover which patients respond earlier, how they evolve over 6–12 weeks, and which patterns influence outcomes.
The clinical challenge with PRP
Your biggest risk is not making a mistake, but not knowing whether you’re getting it right
Clinical variability exists; real evidence does not. Every year, thousands of PRP injections are performed, but the real progress of the patient is still a clinical blind spot in most centres.
+20.374
real treatments evaluated in everyday clinical practice
+80 %
of PRP preparations used in real practice follow the same blood pattern. Discover it.
65 %
f patients with knee osteoarthritis show a clinically relevant improvement in 3 months. Find out more.
In the report, you can see the full detail of these patterns by patient profile.
Why is this PRP analysis clinically unique?
Clinical intuition does not match real data.
This report reveals that gap:
- You don’t know whether your results are better or worse than average.
- You cannot demonstrate efficacy to management without internal evidence.
- Variability between professionals exists, but it is not quantified.
- Patient expectations are not always aligned with real outcomes.
- It is difficult to justify new techniques or investments without comparative data.
Specialists who want to understand what really happens to their patients after PRP:
Trauma care · Pain units · Sports medicine · Private clinics focused on benchmarking

Real World Evidence helps us make better decisions.
It gives you knowledge about your own work and feeds back your results so you can choose the best option.
Dr. Roberto Seijas
Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, specialist in hip and knee arthroscopy

The only way to unify clinical practice is by using tools like BioSmartData. It gives us much more confidence when prescribing these treatments.
Dra. Almudena Fernández
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
(Locomotor system rehabilitation / chronic pain / interventional medicine)

The strength of Real World Evidence is that it helps us close the gap between efficacy (clinical trials) and effectiveness (real life).
Dr. Carlos Cordero
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Head of Rehabilitation Unit)

Clinical trials are too strict and do not reflect real life.
In the clinic you see patients who are overweight, thin, diabetic, tall, fair-skinned, dark-skinned.
The only way to know if a treatment works is by doing this type of analysis.
Dr. Mikel Sánchez
Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, specialist in arthroscopy and regenerative medicine






